Support for EFT for me (Net Income Solutions)

We all heard that Defencex account has been frozen due some laws that apparently were contravened but here this

DEFENCEX: Here is a piece of information on the Legal Process to follow:

The Court granted an interim order to the Registrar of banks and postpone the return date to the 26th of March 2013. This does not mean that the matter will go to Court on the 26th. The Respondents can anticipate the return date on a 12 hours' notice, which means that Chriss and his lawyers can set the matter down for hearing and explain their side as early as Monday depending on their readiness.

What happened on Friday is this: The Registrar of Banks brought an application to Court to freeze DefenceX without giving the Respondents a Notice. This simply means that Chriss and his legal team were not in Court when the order to freeze was granted, and they were not even aware that an application was being made in Court. This is the reason why the Court Order says that the Respondents are called upon to show cause (on the 26th of March) why the order should not be made final.

If Chriss did his home work properly before he introduced defenceX and made sure (through his lawyers and banking consultants) that he complies with all the applicable legislations, he should easily be able to defend this and bring back the scheme as early as next week. With him having been involved with financial schemes for many years, surely he ought to have known what could become a stumbling block in the future and then took the necessary steps to avoid it.

I'm sure that Chris and his legal team are hard at work as you read this short article preparing to take the matter to Court as early as Monday or Tuesday.