Bishop Willliamson's blogsite is found at www.dinoscopus.com, but please be aware of the fact that beginning on August 1st of 2009 Dinoscopus will switch to a subscriber-only format so if you have not yet visited the site yet please do so as soon as possible. The following is the actual notice posted on the site: "Beginning on August 1st, Dinoscopus will switch to a subscriber-only format. If you'd like to receive access, simply send an email with your email address (nothing else required) to dinoscopus@gmail.com. May God strengthen His Excellency Bishop Williamson in his courage to speak the truth in all things whatever the cost may be. The lie of the false religion of "Holocaustianity" (based on the new and false Shoah Theology -- cf www.revisionisthistory.org) which has permeated so much of ouir world and is seeking to severely undermine and even replace Christianity must be broken. Oh, Blessed Virgin Mary, Queen of all Heaven and Earth, look down upon us poor miserable sinners and come to our aid. You did not abandon your Divine Son at the greatest of all holocuasts -- the Holocaust of Calvary some 2,000 years ago. Help us to stay faithful to Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Stay ever close to us as we seek to battle against the infernal forces of darkness. JAMES B. PHILLIPS -- VIVA CHRISTO REY!
 KLANDSERVEGOD - Jul 14, 2009

It seems like the idiocy of the Holocaust propagandists is about on par with what some of us said as a little children when we got into a silly fit of mutual bad mouthing : "I'm rubber. You're glue. Whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks back onto you and whatever I say sticks onto you." (Of course, it was of critical importance to be the first to say this unless you were the exceptional child who blew the whole game by saying, "You're a nice person!") The "Holocausters" say: "We're untouchable. You're condemned. Whatever you say bounces off us and goes back to condemn you and whatever we say condemns you."
 KLANDSERVEGOD - Feb 28, 2009

Dear friends and supporters of Bp. Williamson, Two particularly inspiring and powerful defenses of His Excellency Bishop Richard N. Williamson, may (at the time of this comment submission) be found at http://www.catholicactionresourcecenter.com/defendingbpwilliamson.htm and http://www.catholicactionresourcecenter.com/gorwellbpwilliamson.htm. Let us not forget that perhaps the most incredibly bizarre and evil aspect of this terrible and seemingly out of control gigantic fiasco is that the pope via the Vatican's Secretariat of State directive (see "Nota della Segretaeria di Stato" on the front cover of the 5 February, 2009 issue of L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO as seen at http://newcatholic.googlepages.com/OR_20090205_001.pdf)has in effect required Bishop Williamson to lie (TO LIE -- AS IN TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS -- AS IN TO VIOLATE THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT OF ALMIGHTY GOD!) in order to be admitted "to episcopal functions in the Church." (Perhaps, we can set our eyes on Calvary as we meditate upon the anguished words of our Saviour and then go on to hope and even pray to our heavenly Father that in this instance the reputed Vicar of Christ knows not what he does.) Yes, in effect, Bishop Williamson is being instructed to violate his Catholic conscience by lying/prevaricating -- by basically saying he does not believe what he does believe and not only that, but to do it "in an absolutely unequivocal and public manner." To do this would according to Catholic theology/beliefs/doctrine constitute a lie in the objective order (i.e., the act itself), assuming there was an accompanying intent to deceive. (God judges the degree of personal/subjective culpability, if any, assigned to an individual for deliberately stating an untruth. One obvious reason for a diminution of culpability is if the person stating the lie stated it while subject to psychological, physical, or spiritual duress.) The lie required of Bishop Williamson is to be made public before the whole world. This lie would be an immensely huge deception in so much as it would be an implicit, if not explicit, admission of truth by consent to the monstrous 6 Million (mostly gas chamber victims) Holocaust Myth/Lie/Sacred Talmudic Cow/Idol (which, in and of itself, constitutes a wicked calumny against the German people) by a strict presumably God fearing traditional Roman Catholic Bishop. It is a tremendously evil (albeit "official") falsification of secular history which Pope Benedict XVI appears to accept as a given incontestable fact -- as though written infallibly in stone. The ever continuing and ever increasing massive and downright criminal 6 Million Holohoax/Shoah indoctrination of millions, if not billions, of people worldwide along with the often concurrent and never ending coercive monetary reparations for "Holocaust Survivors" (Ain't no business like Shoah business!) by the Judaic powers to be and their ever willing and or cowed gentile lackeys is truly mind boggling. (Even if Bishop Williamson's Holocaust views were completely erroneous -- which they most definitely are not -- if he sincerely believes them in good faith, it would still constitute a violation of conscience to renounce them -- something strictly forbidden by Catholic doctrine. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, for instance, clearly states in Paragraph 1790: "A human being must always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself." (http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV) It goes without saying that for a properly informed rationale Catholic to deliberately lie is to at one and the same time violate his conscience. Furthermore, the same catechism in Paragraph 1789 states one of the most basic of all Christian truths: "One may never do evil so that good may result from it;" The same paragraph goes on to state that "charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience: 'Thus sinning against your brethren and wounding their conscience . . . you sin against Christ.' [1 Cor 8:12] Therefore 'it is right not to . . . do anything that makes your brother stumble [Rom 14:21].'" (http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV) Let us reflect for a moment on the preceding words/admonishment from this official universal Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) in the context of the draconian demand placed upon Bishop Williamson. Is not Bishop Williamson being given a requirement to do evil (violate his conscience by lying) so that a supposed good may result from it? Then again, if, as the above paragraph from the CCC states, "charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience" how in the world is the mandate from the Vatican to Bishop Williamson charitable?! No, the directive is actually uncharitable to the nth degree in so far as it does anything but respect Bishop Williamson's conscience; and as such it causes an incredible scandal, in and of itself, to any properly informed Catholic, not to mention a vast multitude of largely uninformed Catholics and non-Catholics in general. The full translation of the above referenced directive/mandate (euphemistically referred to as a "Note") from the Secretariat of State (as of the time I am submitting this comment) can be seen in the February 2009 archives at http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/. For the convenience of anyone reading this I have pasted it here: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 URGENT NOTE OF THE SECRETARIAT OF STATEFollowing the reactions caused by the recent Decree of the Congregation for Bishops, with which the excommunication of the four Prelates of the Fraternity of Saint Pius X was remitted, and regarding the Negationist or Reductionist declarations on the Shoah of Bishop Williamson, of the same Fraternity, it is considered convenient to clarify a few aspects of past events. 1. Remission of the excommunication.As already made public previously, the Decree of the Congregation for Bishops, dated January 21, 2009, was an act by which the Holy Father graciously responded to the repeated requests by the Superior General of the Fraternity of Saint Pius X.His Holiness desired to remove an obstacle which prevented the opening of a door to dialogue. He now expects that an equal disposition will be expressed by the four Bishops in complete adherence to the doctrine and discipline of the Church.The extremely grave censure of latae sententiae excommunication, in which the aforementioned Bishops had incurred on June 30, 1988, then formally declared on July 1st of the same year, was a consequence of their illegitimate ordinarion by Mons. Marcel Lefebvre.The removal of the excommunication released the four Bishops from an extremely grave canonical censure, but has not changed the juridical position of the Fraternity of Saint Pius X, which, at the current moment, does not enjoy any canonical recognition by the Catholic Church. Not even the four Bishops, though released from the excommunication, have a canonical function in the Church and they do not exercise licitly a ministry in it. 2. Tradition, doctrine, and the Second Vatican Council.For a future recognition of the Fraternity of Saint Pius X, the full acknowledgment of the Second Vatican Council and of the Magisterium of Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and of the same Benedict XVI is an indispensable conditionAs it was already affirmed in the Decree of January 21, 2009, the Holy See will not avoid, in ways deemed appropriate, discussing with the interested [party] the questions that remain open, so as to be able to reach a full and satisfactory resolution of the problems which originated this painful division. 3. Declarations on the Shoah.The positions of Mons. Williamson on the Shoah are absolutely unacceptable and firmly rejected by the Holy Father, as he himself remarked on the past January 28, when, referring to that brutal genocide, he reaffirmed his full and unquestionable solidarity with our Brethren, receivers of the First Covenant, and affirmed that the memory of that terrible genocide must lead "mankind to reflect on the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of man", adding that the Shoah remains "for all a warning against forgetfulness, against denial or reductionism, because the violence against a single human being is violence against all".Bishop Williamson, for an admission to episcopal functions in the Church, will also have to distance himself, in an absolutely unequivocal and public manner, from his positions regarding the Shoah, unknown to the Holy Father in the moment of the remission of the excommunication.The Holy Father asks to be joined by the prayers of all the faithful, so that the Lord may enlighten the path of the Church. May the effort of the Pastors and of all the faithful increase in support of the delicate and burdensome mission of the Successor of Apostle Peter as "custodian of unity" in the Church.From the Vatican, February 4, 2009.[Translation corrected according to the published version - L'Osservatore Romano, February 5, 2009 - PDF file] ***************************************************************************************************** One might argue that Bishop Williamson could save himself from lying by renouncing/recanting his previously expressed views regarding the alleged Holocaust, but by doing it by what is referred to in Catholic moral theology as mental reservation. I am not a trained moral theologian, but from what I know of Catholic moral theology mental reservation would not be an applicable concept in any recanting -- God forbid! -- by Bishop Williamson. Let us inform ourselves to what should be an obvious fact. The replacement of true unadulterated Christianity by what may be rightly called Christian Zionism and Holocaustianity is taking place around the world every day before our very eyes. We are supposed to be Soldiers of Christ, not "hunker in the chapel bunker" cowards who bow down before human respect. If we were taken before His Holy Tribunal would there even be enough evidence to convict us of being real Christians -- of belonging to the City of God as opposed to the City of man? Holocaustianity is not some cute play on words. It is a damnable fact of everyday life which is sucking the life blood out of whatever remains of the Christian temporal and spiritual order. It must end and we must fight to bring about its end. Whether we succeed or fail is not the point. The point is that we must fight. That is what real soldiers do! Let us fervently pray for His Excellency Bishop Williamson that he stand firm so as to set for us an example of non-compromising Catholic integrity and truth. By his witness in courage let us be inspired and by the grace of Almighty God passed to us through the Immaculate Heart of Mary let us always and everywhere know, love, and serve the Truth. Deus vult! In Christ our King and Mary our Queen, James B. Phillips
 KLANDSERVEGOD - Feb 26, 2009

Text of the petition in English. On January the 21st, a Swedish TV channel aired an interview with Bishop Richard Williamson. In this interview, Bishop Williamson spoke in English and said, in substance, that "there had not been Jews killed by Germans in gas chambers". As we expected it, many authorities from Talmudic Judaism rent their shirts and started threatening. As we expected, the majority of the world press raged against him and against Rome. As we expected, many bishops in France professed again their faith in the Holocaust religion, in order to condemn evidently the one who professes the religion of Golgotha. Later, we learnt with great anxiety that the SSPX's superior, Bishop Bernard Fellay, demanded that Bishop Williamson should refrain from speaking any further in public. Because of that, Bishop Williamson cannot defend his own honour anymore, and also the one of Rome, against the pack of wolves thrown by the entire world against him. We learnt with even more anxiety that Bishop Fellay had apparently declared that the Jews of today were "his brothers in faith". How could those who deny the faith of their patriarchs and prophets be his elder brothers in faith? Catholic or not, but simply attached to historical truth, and to the preservation of the fight of every priest and bishop in the SSPX for the integral Catholic Faith, we express our support for Bishop Richard Williamson and we pray that Bishop Bernard Fellay, in the name of the One who is the Truth and a sign of contradiction in this world, lift the interdict against his brother in the episcopate; so that Bishop Williamson may not be thrown to the lions and delivered up to the internal as well as external enemies of the Catholic Church!
 Louis - Feb 25, 2009

contact us : soutien_mgr_williamson at yahoo.fr
 Louis - Feb 20, 2009

"L'holocauste a été le fer de lance de la nouvelle doctrine du concile Vatican II sur le deicide ("Notre aetate"), la réforme de Paul VI de la prière de vendredi Saint (NOM 1970), la théorie de "l'Alliance ancienne jamais révoquée" de Jean Paul II à Magonza (1981). De plus plus sa "Théologie du silence de Dieu" est née précisément grâce aux réflexions sur l'holocauste, présentée comme telle par les exterminationistes. Certains théologiens (suivant les traces de Hans Jonas et Jean Baptiste Metz) nient la Providence, la Bonté de Dieu et mettent en doute son existence même, en arguant du fait que Dieu aurait autorisé l'holocauste. L'holocauste est pour le judaïsme talmudique une meta(?) histoire absolue ( ‘assoluto meta-storico’), un acte sacrificatoire à valeur salvifique. Après la destruction du Temple (70 ap JC.), l'exégèse rabbinique a remplacé la Foi mosaïque dans le Messie personnel par celle du "messie collectif" qui est le peuple juif. Le Christianisme ne peut pas accepter cette sacralisation de l'holocauste juif, sous peine de renier sa propre foi : l'unique Holocauste est le Sacrifice du Christ. Admettre un autre "holocauste" salvifique et meta historique à côté de celui de Jésus, ce serait un acte d'apostasie. Malheureusement la nouvelle la théologie dirigeant le concile a mis le pied dans la mouvance catholique progressiste, nous espérons que vous ne pollurez pas aussi cet héritage à la Tradition. C'est, par conséquent, le devoir du Pasteur d'en admonester les fidèles." Don Curzio Nitoglia
 Louis - Feb 5, 2009

“Celui qui nie le fait de la Shoah ne sait rien ni du mystère de Dieu, ni de la Croix du Christ”, a déclaré Federico Lombardi, porte-parole du Saint-Siège dans un éditorial de Radio Vatican. Cette proclamation théologique, pour un catholique, est blasphématoire, idolâtre et raciste; elle est incomparablement plus grave que la proclamation, historique, de l’évêque Williamson. Elle est blasphématoire, parce qu’elle introduit un prétendu fait historique, parfaitement contingent, dans le corpus théologique du mystère de Dieu et de la Croix, l’élevant ainsi au niveau d’un article de foi. Dans ce domaine, l’historicité est exclusivement du ressort de la manifestation surnaturelle divine, qui atteint son sommet dans le Christ. L’historicité, en tant qu’article de foi indiscutable, concerne seulement la Révélation et la Vie du Christ. Elle est idolâtre, parce que, entre le mystère de Dieu - la Trinité - et le mystère de la Croix - la Rédemption -, elle place le veau d’or de la Shoah et en fait même un instrument de la compréhension des mystères de la foi. Elle est raciste, parce qu’elle considère la Shoah comme intouchable, échappant et s’élevant au-dessus de toute critique, au point de déclencher l’anathème d’”antisémitisme” (du racisme inversé) pour la moindre transgression, simplement parce qu’elle concerne le juif en tant que juif. (…) Cette énormité se retourne immédiatement contre l’Eglise elle-même. Il lui faut en déduire que le “silence” de Pie XII s’explique par la connivence qu’il entretenait avec ceux qui ont perpétré la Shoah, fait beaucoup plus grave que sa négation, par conséquent Pie XII représenterait la quintessence de celui qui ne savait “rien ni du mystère de Dieu ni de la Croix du Christ”! Sur le plan historiographique, les déclarations de l’évêque Richard Williamson et du prêtre Floriano Abrahamowicz, stigmatisées comme “délirantes” et “antisémites” par la “vertueuse indignation” des nouveaux Pharisiens (qui jamais ne s’élèvent contre les massacreurs israéliens, pour lesquels ils sont toujours prêts à fournir justifications et compréhension), sont en réalité irréprochables. Il n’existe en effet aucune preuve documentaire de l’existence de chambres à gaz homicides dans les camps de concentration nationaux-socialistes, tandis qu’il existe des documents prouvant que toutes les vraies chambres à gaz à l’acide cyanhydrique (Zyklon B) qui s’y trouvaient servaient exclusivement aux fins de désinsectisation. Celui qui affirme le contraire, ou bien ne connaît pas l’histoire, ou est un menteur. Carlo Mattogno
 Louis - Feb 5, 2009

Groupe Yahoo de soutien à Mgr Williamson http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soutien_mgr_williamson/
 Louis - Feb 3, 2009